We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Was Special Field Order 15?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
UnitedStatesNow is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At UnitedStatesNow, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Special Field Order 15 was actually a series of Special Field Orders issued on 16 January 1865, under a single numeric designation. These field orders set aside a huge swath of the Atlantic Coast in the South for the exclusive settlement of freed slaves, established an administrator for the redistribution of the land, and encouraged freed slaves to join the Union Army. Although the order did not last long, as it was repealed in the fall by President Andrew Johnson after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, many people consider it to be a landmark in American history, and it is often used as a precedent in court cases that involve reparations for the descendants of slaves.

These field orders were issued by General William Tecumseh Sherman after meeting with 20 prominent black religious leaders in Savannah, Georgia. Special Field Order 15 was a response to a very real problem, the issue of what to do with the untold numbers of freed slaves in the American South. Many of these people had joined Sherman's March to the Sea, and he was unable to care for them and unsure about what to do with them. Order 15 established a method for dealing with freed slaves while also punishing the South.

Under this order, the lands between Charleston and the Saint John's River in Florida were confiscated for 30 miles (48 kilometers) inland, and broken into 40 acre (16.18 hectare) parcels. Black families were entitled to a parcel each. Subsequently, General Sherman ordered the army to loan mules to the families to work the land, leading to the widespread use of the phrase “40 acres and a mule” in the American South. Naturally, this land was already owned and occupied, primarily by rice planters, but Sherman planned to expel them to make way for the resettlement.

Special Field Order 15 also specified that Brigadier-General Rufus Saxon would administrate the plan and deal with the diverse issues involved, ranging from confiscating the land to creating new deeds for black landowners. This series of field orders was only one among many designed to deal with the cascading problems associated with Reconstruction, as Americans attempted to rebuild a country torn apart by Civil War.

Had this order remained in effect, it certainly would have been a radical legacy. The thought of confiscating and redistributing land might sound suspiciously like communism to most modern Americans, even in the context of reparations, and the character of that region of the United States would undoubtedly be markedly different. As it is, several people have attempted to sue the United States government for reparations related to slavery, arguing that Special Field Order 15 indicated a good faith belief in reparations on the part of the government.

UnitedStatesNow is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a UnitedStatesNow researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By Cageybird — On Feb 27, 2014

@Phaedrus, I want to say that the US government and other countries also considered a similar relocation plan for European Jews during WWII. The landowners along that same Southern coastline would be bought out through eminent domain, then the government would establish basic housing and schools and other necessities for the displaced Jewish population. I don't think this suggestion got past the drawing board, however.

I wonder if freed slaves would have even wanted to be put into a separate part of the country. Many of them chose to remain in the South, since that was now their adopted homeland. Others moved to the Northern free states to find work. I don't know if they would have been truly satisfied with 40 acres and a mule if the area didn't have much else to offer.

By Phaedrus — On Feb 26, 2014

I live in the Deep South, and every once in a while the subject of slave reparations arises. Obviously, the US government could not afford to pay restitution to every descendant of every freed slave. That's usually as far as discussions ever get in courtroom challenges. What happened 150 years ago was a humanitarian disgrace, but the time for actual financial reparations is long past. I think modern generations should recognize the benefits and protections their ancestors never enjoyed.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
UnitedStatesNow, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

UnitedStatesNow, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.